Back to story
Perspective Shift

You read this story from where you sit.
Want to read it from somewhere else?

We'll re-present the same story as a thoughtful proponent of the china-decoupling frame would. Not to convince you. To let you actually meet the argument.

Choose a vantage
Retold from the other vantage
Steelman · slot C
The strategic-decoupling case
A national-security-minded trade hawk would argue —
Reshoring was always one objective among several, and the loudest critics keep pretending it was the only one. In a single year, U.S. imports from China fell by $135 billion — roughly ten percent — which is the fastest peacetime decoupling from a strategic rival in modern American history. That matters whether the displaced production lands in Vietnam, India, or Ohio, because the point is to stop routing critical supply chains through a government that has explicitly told us it intends to contest us militarily in the Pacific. Diversifying to friendlier Asian partners is not a failure mode of the policy; it is the policy. Bringing every job home was never the realistic test, and pretending otherwise is moving the goalposts.

If this read like a fair rendering of the argument — even when you disagree — it's doing its job. Steelmen aren't aimed at persuading you; they're aimed at what the other side actually believes when they're thinking clearly.