Back to story
Perspective Shift

You read this story from where you sit.
Want to read it from somewhere else?

We'll re-present the same story as a thoughtful proponent of the reshoring-takes-time frame would. Not to convince you. To let you actually meet the argument.

Choose a vantage
Tariffs-aren't-working frame
The independent data is in: tariffs haven't reshored jobs or cut import dependence — they've just rerouted supply chains from China to Vietnam and India while raising costs and creating the uncertainty that actually deters factory-building at home.
Reshoring-takes-time frame
Capital investment in U.S. manufacturing has tripled since 2020 and major firms are committing to American factories; turning that money into operating plants takes years, so judging Liberation Day tariffs by one year of jobs data misses the actual trajectory.
China-decoupling frame
Even if domestic factory jobs haven't surged, U.S. imports from China fell roughly 10 percent in a single year — a meaningful strategic decoupling from a geopolitical rival, which was always part of what the tariffs were meant to do.
Retold from the other vantage
Steelman · slot B
The long-cycle case
An industrial-policy advocate would argue —
Factories are not Amazon orders. A semiconductor fab takes four to five years from groundbreaking to first wafer; a steel mill or auto plant is a similar horizon. So when critics point to a 1.5 percent capacity bump after one year of Liberation Day tariffs and declare the policy a failure, they're grading a tree by what it looks like the spring after planting. The actual leading indicator — capital commitment — has tripled since 2020. Apple, U.S. Steel, and others are putting real money down. Kearney itself attributes the lag to construction timelines and workforce pipelines, not to a verdict that reshoring isn't happening. Judge the policy in 2029, when the concrete has cured.

If this read like a fair rendering of the argument — even when you disagree — it's doing its job. Steelmen aren't aimed at persuading you; they're aimed at what the other side actually believes when they're thinking clearly.