Back to story
Perspective Shift

You read this story from where you sit.
Want to read it from somewhere else?

We'll re-present the same story as a thoughtful proponent of the maga-coalition fracture frame would. Not to convince you. To let you actually meet the argument.

Choose a vantage
Retold from the other vantage
Steelman · slot C
The oligarchs Trump promised to break
A populist-right strategist would argue —
The base did not vote for a venture capitalist to run AI policy from inside Craft Ventures. They voted to break the power of the people who censored them, addicted their kids, shipped their jobs to China, and treated working Americans as an inconvenience. Instead they got an executive order forbidding their own state legislatures from regulating chatbots, a reversal that lets Nvidia sell H20s and H200s to Beijing, a UAE chip deal entangled with Witkoff and Binance, and a $500,000-a-seat Georgetown club for the donor class. Tucker is right: people are touchy because a technology that promises to concentrate power further is being handed, unregulated, to the same men who already have most of it. If the GOP becomes the party of the Innovation Council, the left-right coalition against the oligarchy writes itself by 2028.

If this read like a fair rendering of the argument — even when you disagree — it's doing its job. Steelmen aren't aimed at persuading you; they're aimed at what the other side actually believes when they're thinking clearly.