Back to story
Perspective Shift

You read this story from where you sit.
Want to read it from somewhere else?

We'll re-present the same story as a thoughtful proponent of the tech-right realignment frame would. Not to convince you. To let you actually meet the argument.

Choose a vantage
Retold from the other vantage
Steelman · slot B
Why we stopped apologizing
A Silicon Valley founder-investor would argue —
The Biden administration treated frontier technology as a threat to be contained: vague crypto rules enforced by ruinous actions, an AI executive order pointing toward a regulated oligopoly of a few approved labs, an FTC posture that read every successful company as a defendant-in-waiting. We were told that in exchange for building, hiring, and paying taxes we'd get a free hand — and then the deal was unilaterally torn up. Sacks's bet on Trump is not sycophancy; it is the recognition that if America wants to lead in AI and set the global standard for digital dollars, the private sector has to be allowed to actually build. A stablecoin law backed one-to-one by Treasuries entrenches the dollar. An 80–90 percent global share of the American tech stack is what winning looks like. Europe chose precaution and got stagnation. We are choosing to cook.

If this read like a fair rendering of the argument — even when you disagree — it's doing its job. Steelmen aren't aimed at persuading you; they're aimed at what the other side actually believes when they're thinking clearly.