Back to story
Perspective Shift

You read this story from where you sit.
Want to read it from somewhere else?

We'll re-present the same story as a thoughtful proponent of the local-impact frame would. Not to convince you. To let you actually meet the argument.

Choose a vantage
Retold from the other vantage
Steelman · slot C
The people next to the pipeline get a vote
A Louisiana community organizer would argue —
In Washington and at San Francisco Climate Week, executives talk about CO₂ as a strategic commodity. In Louisiana, we're the ones living on top of where they want to put it. We just marched on the state Capitol on Earth Day because nobody has given us straight answers about pipeline ruptures, well integrity, or what happens to our groundwater and our air. A Columbia Law School scholar looking at the actual conditions on the ground called the outlook for these projects "fairly grim," and that's not because of Trump — it's because residents have read the permits. Industry can line up Republican officials and federal dollars all it wants. The permits still have to clear the communities that bear the risk.

If this read like a fair rendering of the argument — even when you disagree — it's doing its job. Steelmen aren't aimed at persuading you; they're aimed at what the other side actually believes when they're thinking clearly.