Back to story
Perspective Shift

You read this story from where you sit.
Want to read it from somewhere else?

We'll re-present the same story as a thoughtful proponent of the public-safety enforcement frame would. Not to convince you. To let you actually meet the argument.

Choose a vantage
Retold from the other vantage
Steelman · slot A
Closing the accountability gap
A traffic-safety regulator would argue —
When a Waymo made an illegal U-turn directly in front of San Bruno officers last September, they pulled it over and discovered they had no one to ticket. That is not a quirky anecdote — it is a hole in the basic deterrence structure of traffic law. Moving violations get deterred because someone pays a fine and accumulates points; if a robotaxi fleet faces neither, the incentive to fix the underlying software bug is purely reputational. Our new rules route the citation to the manufacturer, where the actual decision-making lives, and require a 30-second response when emergency crews call. That is how you make a fleet operator internalize the cost of every illegal turn and every blocked fire truck.

If this read like a fair rendering of the argument — even when you disagree — it's doing its job. Steelmen aren't aimed at persuading you; they're aimed at what the other side actually believes when they're thinking clearly.