Back to story
Perspective Shift

You read this story from where you sit.
Want to read it from somewhere else?

We'll re-present the same story as a thoughtful proponent of the property rights and due process frame would. Not to convince you. To let you actually meet the argument.

Choose a vantage
Regulatory overreach frame
A nursery owner who took every reasonable precaution had 32,000 healthy plants destroyed because a bug was detected five miles away, showing how sweeping quarantine rules crush small businesses without bothering to test the trees actually being killed.
Agricultural biosecurity frame
Citrus greening has already gutted Florida's industry, and California's quarantine protocols exist to stop the same collapse here; an incurable disease in the area justifies destroying nursery stock that refused to comply with containment requirements.
Property rights and due process frame
The state declared a quarantine based on an undisclosed detection, offered impossible compliance options, couldn't produce evidence of infection on the property, and destroyed the stock anyway — a case study in why owners need real recourse against agency action.
Retold from the other vantage
Steelman · slot C
The undisclosed-detection problem
A property-rights litigator would argue —
Strip away the bug and look at the procedure. The state drew a quarantine zone around Collins's property based on a detection it would not disclose. It offered him three compliance options his lawsuit credibly describes as physically impossible on his acreage. At the administrative hearing, CDFA could not produce evidence that a single tree on Evergreen's property was infected — and the destruction order issued anyway. Whatever one thinks of citrus policy, a regime in which an agency can destroy $3 million in private property without showing infection, on the basis of undisclosed evidence about a neighbor's land, is not due process. It's an outcome searching for a procedure.

If this read like a fair rendering of the argument — even when you disagree — it's doing its job. Steelmen aren't aimed at persuading you; they're aimed at what the other side actually believes when they're thinking clearly.