Back to story
Perspective Shift

You read this story from where you sit.
Want to read it from somewhere else?

We'll re-present the same story as a thoughtful proponent of the regulatory overreach frame would. Not to convince you. To let you actually meet the argument.

Choose a vantage
Retold from the other vantage
Steelman · slot A
The crushed-by-the-perimeter case
A small-business advocate would argue —
Mark Collins did everything a responsible nursery owner could do: he built insect-resistant ACP houses, sprayed regularly, treated his soil, and kept his stock healthy. The state never produced evidence that a single one of his 32,000 trees carried the disease. They were destroyed because a bug was detected five miles away and his property happened to fall inside a radius drawn on a map. When Collins asked why the trees couldn't simply be tested before being chainsawed, he was told CDFA lacked the funding. That is the regulatory state in miniature — money to destroy a man's life's work, but not to verify whether destruction is warranted.

If this read like a fair rendering of the argument — even when you disagree — it's doing its job. Steelmen aren't aimed at persuading you; they're aimed at what the other side actually believes when they're thinking clearly.