Back to story
Perspective Shift

You read this story from where you sit.
Want to read it from somewhere else?

We'll re-present the same story as a thoughtful proponent of the ai-skeptic veteran frame would. Not to convince you. To let you actually meet the argument.

Choose a vantage
Retold from the other vantage
Steelman · slot A
The forty-year view from inside the lab
A senior AI researcher who has lived through prior hype cycles would argue —
I've been doing this for forty years, and I've watched my own field repeatedly convince itself human-level intelligence was just around the corner. It wasn't, and it isn't now. Today's models are powerful tools, but they still can't reason in any robust sense — that's precisely why I'm building new architectures to address what current systems can't do. The claim that this revolution is categorically different from electricity or the internet doesn't survive contact with the history of productivity gains, which take roughly fifteen years to materialize. New tools displace some jobs and create others; that pattern is going to hold here too. Telling kids to skip college and brace for extinction is making a generational bet on a forecast the underlying science does not support.

If this read like a fair rendering of the argument — even when you disagree — it's doing its job. Steelmen aren't aimed at persuading you; they're aimed at what the other side actually believes when they're thinking clearly.