Back to story
Perspective Shift

You read this story from where you sit.
Want to read it from somewhere else?

We'll re-present the same story as a thoughtful proponent of the erratic dealmaker frame would. Not to convince you. To let you actually meet the argument.

Choose a vantage
Retold from the other vantage
Steelman · slot A
The unreliable-counterparty case
A veteran trade negotiator would argue —
We had a deal. The EU swallowed a hard pill on Liberation Day, agreed to invest in the US, agreed to changes that would boost American exports, and got the auto rate brought down from 30%. Now, with no notice, no specifics, no formal process — just a Truth Social post — the rate jumps to 25% because the President says Europe is "not adhering" to the deal, while refusing to say how. That is not negotiation; it is improvisation by tweet. Even Brussels' implementing legislation is still being drafted by Lange's committee for a June finalization — the ink isn't dry, and we're already tearing pages out. No counterparty, ally or adversary, can plan around a US that treats its own signed commitments as opening bids.

If this read like a fair rendering of the argument — even when you disagree — it's doing its job. Steelmen aren't aimed at persuading you; they're aimed at what the other side actually believes when they're thinking clearly.