Back to story
Perspective Shift

You read this story from where you sit.
Want to read it from somewhere else?

We'll re-present the same story as a thoughtful proponent of the tax-flight frame would. Not to convince you. To let you actually meet the argument.

Choose a vantage
Tax-flight frame
Seattle's new socialist leadership is openly daring its productive residents to leave, and the data show they will — wealthy filers, major employers, and their tax base are already migrating to lower-tax states, and the city will be left poorer for it.
Good-riddance frame
Threats that millionaires will flee are an overblown bluff used to block redistribution; if a handful of billionaires and corporations decamp rather than pay their share, the city loses little and finally gets a tax code that funds public goods.
Retold from the other vantage
Steelman · slot A
Capital is mobile; contempt is expensive
A state tax economist would argue —
The mayor's laugh is the policy. Washington just stacked a 7% capital gains tax and a 9.9% millionaire's tax on top of an already heavy local burden, pushing Seattle's top effective rate on wage and RSU income to roughly 18% — the highest in the country. The response is not theoretical: Fisher Investments relocated its headquarters to Texas, Starbucks is shifting corporate jobs to Tennessee, Bezos moved to Florida and saved over a billion on a single stock sale, and Microsoft is openly warning about job placement. IRS migration data show the pattern at scale — Massachusetts lost $141,000 in AGI per departing filer, Illinois $110,000. You can dislike these people, but you cannot fund a city by insulting the filers who pay a disproportionate share of the bill.

If this read like a fair rendering of the argument — even when you disagree — it's doing its job. Steelmen aren't aimed at persuading you; they're aimed at what the other side actually believes when they're thinking clearly.