Back to story
Perspective Shift

You read this story from where you sit.
Want to read it from somewhere else?

We'll re-present the same story as a thoughtful proponent of the career-legacy frame would. Not to convince you. To let you actually meet the argument.

Choose a vantage
Personal remembrance frame
A friend and longtime collaborator has died suddenly, and what matters now is honoring the man — his warmth, his sharp mind, the dinners and conversations — alongside a quick accounting of an extraordinary life in law and national security.
Career-legacy frame
Baker's death marks the loss of one of the most consequential national-security lawyers of his generation — NSA general counsel, DHS policy chief, Stevens clerk, Steptoe partner — whose institutional footprint deserves recognition on its own terms.
Retold from the other vantage
Steelman · slot B
A consequential national-security lawyer
A national-security bar colleague would argue —
Stewart Baker's résumé is not a list of jobs; it is a map of where serious legal thinking about surveillance, intelligence, and homeland security actually happened over four decades. He clerked for Justice Stevens, served as General Counsel of the NSA from 1992 to 1994, and ran policy at DHS from 2005 to 2009 — bookending the pre- and post-9/11 transformations of the American security state from inside the rooms where those rules were written. Add a long Steptoe partnership and a steady stream of writing, and you have one of the defining national-security lawyers of his generation. His death deserves to be marked on those terms, independent of any one friendship or publication.

If this read like a fair rendering of the argument — even when you disagree — it's doing its job. Steelmen aren't aimed at persuading you; they're aimed at what the other side actually believes when they're thinking clearly.