Back to story
Perspective Shift

You read this story from where you sit.
Want to read it from somewhere else?

We'll re-present the same story as a thoughtful proponent of the disaster-preparedness frame would. Not to convince you. To let you actually meet the argument.

Choose a vantage
Public-health continuity frame
Disasters expose a dangerous gap in addiction care: when pharmacies close and supply chains break, people on medications like buprenorphine and methadone face withdrawal and relapse, so regulators must loosen prescribing rules to keep treatment uninterrupted.
Disaster-preparedness frame
Hurricanes and other emergencies are predictable shocks to medical infrastructure, and the system still isn't built to keep vulnerable patients connected to care during them — clinicians are pushing lawmakers to plan for medication access before the next storm hits, not after.
Retold from the other vantage
Steelman · slot B
Plan for the storm we know is coming
A disaster-preparedness clinician would argue —
Helene was not a surprise, and neither will the next hurricane, wildfire, or flood be. We know that disasters reliably sever the supply chain for controlled medications, and we know which patient populations decompensate fastest when that happens — people on medications for opioid use disorder are near the top of that list. Yet every event, we improvise: ad hoc waivers, scrambling clinicians, patients driving hours to find an open methadone clinic. The fix is to legislate the contingency in advance — pre-authorized emergency prescribing flexibilities, mobile dosing units staged before landfall, interstate licensure compacts that activate on a federal disaster declaration. Building this into preparedness planning costs little and saves lives that the current reactive posture predictably loses.

If this read like a fair rendering of the argument — even when you disagree — it's doing its job. Steelmen aren't aimed at persuading you; they're aimed at what the other side actually believes when they're thinking clearly.