Back to story
Perspective Shift

You read this story from where you sit.
Want to read it from somewhere else?

We'll re-present the same story as a thoughtful proponent of the pattern-of-sloppiness frame would. Not to convince you. To let you actually meet the argument.

Choose a vantage
Retold from the other vantage
Steelman · slot B
The signature-means-something case
A legal-ethics observer would argue —
A single garbled marketing line is trivial in isolation. But this lawyer was just sanctioned over AI-hallucinated citations in a filing — a brief drafted by an associate that he personally signed. Rule 11 exists precisely so that a signature is a representation of having read and verified the work; outsourcing that duty to a junior, who outsourced it to a chatbot, is the failure mode the sanction was punishing. Against that backdrop, a self-promotional page bragging about 'multi-figure verdicts' that nobody bothered to proofread isn't a charming glitch — it's the same inattention to what goes out under the lawyer's name, just with lower stakes. The pattern is the story.

If this read like a fair rendering of the argument — even when you disagree — it's doing its job. Steelmen aren't aimed at persuading you; they're aimed at what the other side actually believes when they're thinking clearly.