Back to story
Perspective Shift

You read this story from where you sit.
Want to read it from somewhere else?

We'll re-present the same story as a thoughtful proponent of the overcriminalization frame would. Not to convince you. To let you actually meet the argument.

Choose a vantage
Retold from the other vantage
Steelman · slot B
The Sarbanes-Oxley grouper case
A criminal-justice reformer would argue —
Consider John Yates, a Florida fisherman whose home was surrounded by armed federal agents and who lost his livelihood and spent Christmas in prison — prosecuted under a corporate-accounting statute written for Enron, on the theory that undersized red grouper were 'tangible objects' destroyed to obstruct an investigation. This is what happens when Congress adds two to three million words to the federal code each year and the Federal Register balloons from 16 pages to 70,000 annually. Madison feared exactly this proliferation, which is why he made lawmaking hard. Every statute is a restriction on liberty, and when ordinary people intending no harm get swallowed by command-and-control regimes pursued with the very best of intentions, the rule of law collapses into mere rule by law.

If this read like a fair rendering of the argument — even when you disagree — it's doing its job. Steelmen aren't aimed at persuading you; they're aimed at what the other side actually believes when they're thinking clearly.