Back to story
Perspective Shift

You read this story from where you sit.
Want to read it from somewhere else?

We'll re-present the same story as a thoughtful proponent of the corporate capture frame would. Not to convince you. To let you actually meet the argument.

Choose a vantage
Retold from the other vantage
Steelman · slot B
An express lane for fossil capital
A climate litigator would argue —
Look at what actually happened in the Clean Power Plan stay. The EPA's own modeling showed the rule would shift generation away from coal — and Roberts treated that shift itself as the "irreparable harm" justifying emergency intervention. There was no oral argument, no full briefing, no factual record developed below; there was a coalition of fossil-fuel-backed state attorneys general, and there was a Chief Justice willing to halt a duly promulgated federal regulation in weeks rather than years. That is not a court of last resort cautiously preserving the status quo. That is an expedited service window, and the customers are the industries whose business model depends on delaying climate regulation until the underlying authority can be litigated away.

If this read like a fair rendering of the argument — even when you disagree — it's doing its job. Steelmen aren't aimed at persuading you; they're aimed at what the other side actually believes when they're thinking clearly.