Back to story
Perspective Shift

You read this story from where you sit.
Want to read it from somewhere else?

We'll re-present the same story as a thoughtful proponent of the misread-the-messenger frame would. Not to convince you. To let you actually meet the argument.

Choose a vantage
Retold from the other vantage
Steelman · slot C
The wrong-villain case
An observer of Israel's political system would argue —
Isaac Herzog is the former leader of the Labor Party who ran against Netanyahu from the center-left, and he now occupies a presidency that is deliberately nonpartisan and largely symbolic — a post designed for unity and compromise, just as his right-wing predecessor Reuven Rivlin used it. If you wanted to protest the Israeli government's prosecution of the war, there is a long list of ministers and coalition partners who actually set that policy. Choosing Herzog — the moderate, ceremonial figure whose entire role is to hold a fractious country together — as your symbol of Israeli extremism tells you the critique has lost its grip on who is who. It's protesting the office of reconciliation because it has an Israeli flag behind it.

If this read like a fair rendering of the argument — even when you disagree — it's doing its job. Steelmen aren't aimed at persuading you; they're aimed at what the other side actually believes when they're thinking clearly.