Back to story
Perspective Shift

You read this story from where you sit.
Want to read it from somewhere else?

We'll re-present the same story as a thoughtful proponent of the greenwashing-by-offset frame would. Not to convince you. To let you actually meet the argument.

Choose a vantage
Retold from the other vantage
Steelman · slot B
The accounting-trick case
A climate accountability researcher would argue —
Look at the math. A few hundred thousand tons over a decade — that's tens of thousands of tons a year against a data center expansion consuming gigawatts of largely fossil-fired power. The deal is rounding error, but it buys NTT Data the language of a 2040 net-zero commitment and a press cycle about climate leadership. Worse, it includes cheaper nature-based credits whose durability is genuinely contested, mixed in with the engineered removals that give the announcement its credibility. The honest path for a company underpinning the AI economy is to slow or clean up the buildout itself — siting near firm clean power, disclosing real emissions per unit of compute. Offsets at this ratio aren't a climate strategy; they're a permission slip to keep building.

If this read like a fair rendering of the argument — even when you disagree — it's doing its job. Steelmen aren't aimed at persuading you; they're aimed at what the other side actually believes when they're thinking clearly.