Back to story
Perspective Shift

You read this story from where you sit.
Want to read it from somewhere else?

We'll re-present the same story as a thoughtful proponent of the antisemitism on campus frame would. Not to convince you. To let you actually meet the argument.

Choose a vantage
Antisemitism on campus frame
Defunding Hillel is not a policy critique of Israel but discrimination against Jewish students, part of a broader pattern targeting kosher restaurants, Chabad houses, and synagogues simply for being Jewish institutions.
NGO infiltration frame
Terror-linked organizations are exploiting the protected status of human-rights NGOs to launder operations into Western civic institutions, with groups like al-Haq and the Hind Rajab Foundation supplying the ammunition for campaigns against Jewish communities.
Criminalizing Jewish practice frame
Activists are now treating ordinary religious life — tying tzitzit for soldiers, studying in Israeli yeshivot, reciting memorial prayers — as evidence of war crimes, effectively trying to make the practice of Judaism itself legally suspect.
Retold from the other vantage
Steelman · slot A
The Hillel defunding is discrimination
A campus civil-rights advocate would argue —
Strip away the Israel rhetoric and look at what the New School's student senate actually voted to do: cut off funding to the one organization on campus that exists to support Jewish students. Hillel isn't a foreign ministry; it's where Jewish kids go for Shabbat dinner. The same movement is targeting kosher restaurants, Chabad houses, and synagogues — institutions defined by Jewish religious life, not Israeli policy. If a student government voted to defund the Black Student Union because some members supported a contested government abroad, we would correctly call it what it is. The university administration saw this clearly and overruled the senate. The test isn't the activists' stated motive; it's whether the burden falls on Jews qua Jews. Here it plainly does.

If this read like a fair rendering of the argument — even when you disagree — it's doing its job. Steelmen aren't aimed at persuading you; they're aimed at what the other side actually believes when they're thinking clearly.